• Nexus
        • SSI Nexusは、SSIソフトウェアのユーザー、作成者、および実装者が集まる場所です。 ここでは、ベストプラクティスと業界のトレンドについて議論し、共通の課題に取り組み、最新のソフトウェアにアクセスし、それらを結び付ける製品の将来へのインプットを提供します。

        • MyLearning
        • SSI MyLearningは、SSIユーザーが詳細なトレーニング演習、資料、コース、および認定資格にアクセスできる場所です。 自己指導型のトレーニングカリキュラムにより、トレーニングはスケジュールどおりに、最も必要なときに実行されます。

        • SSIブログ
        • SSIブログは、造船とテクノロジーの交差点、業界の進歩、SSIニュースの最新情報を得るための場所です。 SSIの共同CEOであるDenis MoraisとDarren Larkinsの最新記事を読む唯一の場所です。

          Lighthouse Waveform | Crow’s Nest

        • シップコンストラクター
        • 情報をビジネスに合わせて取得するということは、船舶のライフサイクルの各段階を通して造船固有の課題と情報要件を処理するために構築されたソリューションを使用することを意味します。

        • エンタープライズプラットフォーム
        • 造船所のすべてのプロセスはデータを必要とします。ツール間でデータを適切な形式でシームレスに共有することで、意味のある実用的な情報を組織全体で利用できるようになります。造船プロジェクトに必要なカスタマイズされたツールを自由に選択できます。

        • ShipbuildingPLM
        • 造船には多くの部門間で慎重な調整が必要ですが、意思決定のための情報が多数のレガシーソフトウェアシステムとスプレッドシートにサイロ化されることが非常に多いです。これらのサイロを開くことで、各部門は、必要なときに必要な情報にアクセスできます。

        • 会社
        • SSI弊社のリーダーシップの詳細をご覧ください。

        • 場所と連絡先
        • グローバルに存在するパートナーが必要です。

        • ニュース
        • SSIと造船の最新情報

        • イベント
        • 次のイベント、カンファレンス、トレードショーに参加してください。

        • パートナー
        • プラットフォームおよび開発パートナーの詳細をご覧ください。

        • クライアント
        • SSIを信頼する業界リーダーをご覧ください。

        • キャリア
        • 造船業を可能にします。

  • 日本の造船会社のための戦略
6月 2, 2022
ベストプラクティス

Consistent outputs rely on consistent inputs from designers and predetermined formats that pull information whenever possible from the common product model, minimizing human error.

In Part 1 we reviewed the impacts of non-standardized deliverables beginning with part creation, through modeling, drawing deliverables, change management, and the effects on downstream processes such as PLM and ERP systems. Taking the time to create a process for designers quickly improves the efficiency and quality of the model and drawing outputs and mitigates those same impacts.

Determine the standard

Producing standardized, consistent documents begins by determining what the standard is. While standards may be known, it is important to check in with all the stakeholders periodically to ensure organizational requirements are consistently met. To determine if engineering deliverables are fit for purpose, here are some questions to ask:

QuestionsExample
Are the drawings fit for purpose?If the drawing is an assembly drawing, it should contain only assembly drawing details. Fabrication (part cut) and installation (ship measurement) details should be shown on other drawings.
Do drawings contain all the information required?  Ensure no measurements or details required are missing. Ensure no critical details can be misinterpreted.
Are there any legacy requirements that can be removed?Not long ago, every panel needed to be dimensioned. Nowadays, machines etch the mold lines of connecting plates and profiles onto plates, and only a few overall dimensions are required. It is not uncommon to see legacy requirements like this still being incorporated into drawings.
Do drawing BOMs contain the right information?The product model could reference 50+ database attributes. To keep drawings easy to use, ensure only the relevant properties are shown.

A team’s efficiency must not sacrifice organizational efficiency. An engineering department may be able to churn out drawings, but if their efficiency creates more work downstream, the organization suffers. For example, production departments may manually determine missing dimensions, add production markings, and break spools down further for access and removal. All these things can quickly or automatically be added by the engineering teams.

It starts with catalog creation

Efficient, repeatable deliverables begin with consistent stock catalog entries. Creating acceptance criteria for designers ensures part data is added correctly to meet organization requirements. For example, adding an equipment part:

Equipment Library Acceptance CriteriaCheck
The equipment has a name consistent with internal standards 
The equipment has at least one insertion point added 
The equipment has all connections added Piping HVAC Electrical 
The equipment has a valid weight defined 
The equipment has required accessory packages added 
The equipment 3D model has been optimized to be lightweight (using shrinkwrap in Inventor or similar) 
The equipment has required maintenance and shock envelopes defined 
The equipment geometry is on the required layer 
Required user-defined attributes (UDAs) are added 
The equipment is inserted into the PEL (Project Equipment List) and assigned stock 

Modeling Requirements

Continuing with the example of equipment, the following acceptance criteria should be met when placing equipment in the common product model.

Equipment Modelling Acceptance CriteriaWhy?Check
The equipment items are valid, inserted from the catalog, not ‘dumb solids.’‘Dumb solids’ can be quick to create but do not contain the metadata to create an intelligent model – inaccurate weight, no parametric relationships, no BOM data, etc. 
The equipment connections (Pipe, HVAC, and Electrical) are connected to somethingConnecting interfacing equipment creates a parametric model and ensures only valid parts can be connected. 
The equipment items use an auto-generated part nameConsistent naming of all parts 
The equipment is placed within the appropriate drawing/modelEquipment should be placed in the system it belongs, e.g., a pump should be placed within the pipe system it belongs to for quick referencing 
The equipment is assigned to the work breakdown structure (assembly)For visualization and drawing generation, equipment needs to be placed in the appropriate assembly sequence 

Bridging the experience gap between designers

Experienced designers, through their time at the shipyard, or designers with trade backgrounds, think practically about producibility and installation. Creating a checklist for designers helps bridge the gap by leveraging the experience of others. Here are some examples of acceptance criteria when inserting equipment into the design and creating drawing outputs.

Equipment location checklistCheck
Have foundations been allowed for (if applicable) 
Have shock mounts been allowed for (if applicable) 
Has clash detection been run 
Have maintenance envelopes checked (If applicable) 
Is the equipment placed in the maintenance/operation space of other equipment 
Can the bolts be tightened (Can you get hands and tools to the bolt holes) 
Can a welder reach the required location 
If deck mounted, can water drain around it 
Equipment drawing output checklistCheck
Is there measurements locating the equipment on foundations 
Do mounting holes need to be templated and cut on-site 
Can the measurements be measured on-site with a tape measure
(Not to refer to a place like a ship centreline)  
 
Do the measurements account for material thicknesses 

 Templates drive repeatable drawing outputs

Templates for each deliverable type can be created, with pre-configured information, ensuring repeatable deliverables. Templates for each drawing type require title blocks pre-filled with database-generated information. Drawing views should be pre-configured with appropriate BOMs, display styles, label styles, and drawing views.

Further to drawing generation – consistent text, leader, dimension, line weights, and line type standards conforming with international, local, and defense standards should all be considered.

Example – Class Approval Drawing
Example – Assembly drawing (Pre-Outfitting)
Drawing template checklistCheck
Preconfigured styles (dimensions, annotations, leaders, balloons, BOMs) 
Preconfigured title block populated from database values 
Preconfigured layers, layer styles (Line weights, colors) and layer states 
Preconfigured display styles for each drawing type 
Preconfigured label styles for labeling views with database values rather than manual notes 

Conclusion

Standardized, repeatable deliverables are critical to an organization’s success. The effects of inconsistent data can last decades. Creating a process for designers is a great way to improve both team and organizational efficiency. In short, to achieve success with standardized deliverables:

  1. Regularly review deliverable requirements.
  2. Create Acceptance Criteria for designers to ensure consistent model inputs.
  3. Bridge the gap between different designer skills with a checklist.
  4. Automate repetitive tasks and processes with quality templates for each drawing type.

close

Don't Miss These Shipbuilding Strategies

Subscribe to the Shipbuilding Solutions blog and get actionable strategies and best practices from industry experts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.